Jews

[Snakeway]

Science documented Jews are Humans, but I look at their soul and it is not humans. Therefore Jews being Humans can't be science because it is not verifiable by pratical means

How do we know it's not just a problem with your mental health? Science goes on our objective reality, yet your own personal subjective reality conflicts with science? Should the whole world conform to your subjective perceptions?

it is not subjective, it is objective because I can see. You are the one who has a subjective perception because you don't accept something because it is not convenient to you. It is not science if can't be verifiable by pratical means, in the case by looking at their soul. The whole world should simply open their astral sight and see by themselves. This way we would also know it is not my mental health

[HPBlackMamba]

it is not subjective, it is objective because I can see. You are the one who has a subjective perception because you don't accept something because it is not convenient to you. It is not science if can't be verifiable by pratical means, in the case by looking at their soul. The whole world should simply open their astral sight and see by themselves.

The definition of objective is not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing fact i.e. looking outside of your own personal perceptions and biases. If you are the only one that can see this with your astral sight, then it's subjective by definition. If everyone could see it with their astral sight, it would still be subjective because everyone's perception is different. If you can produce some concrete proof that can be reproduced numerous times in a controlled environment, then I would say that you are on to something. Else you should probably see a shrink.

[Snakeway]

it is not subjective, it is objective because I can see. You are the one who has a subjective perception because you don't accept something because it is not convenient to you. It is not science if can't be verifiable by pratical means, in the case by looking at their soul. The whole world should simply open their astral sight and see by themselves.

The definition of objective is not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing fact i.e. looking outside of your own personal perceptions and biases. If you are the only one that can see this with your astral sight, then it's subjective by definition. If everyone could see it with their astral sight, it would still be subjective because everyone's perception is different. If you can produce some concrete proof that can be reproduced numerous times in a controlled environment, then I would say that you are on to something. Else you should probably see a shrink.

If there is one angle that contradict what is scientificly documented, then it is not science anymore. Looking at a jewish soul that is different than the one of gentiles is one angle. If everybody see the same thing it is objective. As an exemple it is objective a cat has 4 legs because everybody sees it and count it. If what people see were subjective then even what people read in a scientific document would be subjective and none could be counted as science, because everyone perception of what is documented would be different.

[Snakeway]

Else you should probably see a shrink.

It is good that you brought that up because seeing spirits and astral beings is a mental ilness according to scientific documents. Do you admit to have a mental ilness since you see spirits?

[HPBlackMamba]

If there is one angle that contradict what is scientificly documented, then it is not science anymore. Looking at a jewish soul that is different than the one of gentiles is one angle. If everybody see the same thing it is objective. As an exemple it is objective a cat has 4 legs because everybody sees it and count it. If what people see were subjective then even what people read in a scientific document would be subjective and none could be counted as science, because everyone perception of what is documented would be different.

In science nothing is 100% objective, or verifiable but it is objective enough to give us good reason to believe that something is true. If your perception was backed by something more concrete, then we could give it consideration and look deeper into the matter. But to claim that your sole subjective perception is enough to contradict what has been scientifically documented by teams of geneticists, DNA researchers, biologists etc.(who have reached independent consensus) is a bold, absurd and arrogant claim that carries no weight whatsoever. Therefore it doesn't merit any consideration.

[Snakeway]

In science nothing is 100% objective, or verifiable but it is objective enough to give us good reason to believe that something is true. If your perception was backed by something more concrete, then we could give it consideration and look deeper into the matter. But to claim that your sole subjective perception is enough to contradict what has been scientifically documented by teams of geneticists, DNA researchers, biologists etc.(who have reached independent consensus) is a bold, absurd and arrogant claim that carries no weight whatsoever. Therefore it doesn't merit any consideration.

If what has been scientifically documented by teams of geneticists, DNA researchers, biologists etc.(who have reached independent consensus) can't be verified by a simple look at their soul then their scientific documents are a bold, absurd and arrogant claim that carries no weight whatsoever. Therefore it doesn't merit any consideration.

[HPBlackMamba]

It is good that you brought that up because seeing spirits and astral beings is a mental ilness according to scientific documents. Do you admit to have a mental ilness since you see spirits?

It's not necessarily a mental illness, science just can't interact with it. That doesn't mean that there aren't spirits or multidimensional beings, science just can't interact with it. It just means that believing in such is irrational. Everyone has irrational beliefs, and for the most part that is okay, as long as it doesn't hurt others or impair your quality of life.

When it comes to your personal beliefs, my advice is to always go on what is rational or objectively true first, and if an irrational belief compliments or augments this, that is perfectly fine.

[HPBlackMamba]

If what has been scientifically documented by teams of geneticists, DNA researchers, biologists etc.(who have reached independent consensus) can't be verified by a simple look at their soul then their scientific documents are a bold, absurd and arrogant claim that carries no weight whatsoever. Therefore it doesn't merit any consideration.

That is another fallacy, because the truth is not subject or bound to your own whimsical fantasies or perceptions. There is no such thing as "my truth", there is only truth.

[Snakeway]

If what has been scientifically documented by teams of geneticists, DNA researchers, biologists etc.(who have reached independent consensus) can't be verified by a simple look at their soul then their scientific documents are a bold, absurd and arrogant claim that carries no weight whatsoever. Therefore it doesn't merit any consideration.

That is another fallacy, because the truth is not subject or bound to your own whimsical fantasies or perceptions. There is no such thing as "my truth", there is only truth.

You are saying being able to see a soul is a fantasy and a perception, then everything you see would also be a fantasy and a perception. EVERYBODY would see this with an astral sigh. This is everybody's truth, the soul of a Jew is different from the one of gentiles making them not Human

[Snakeway]

It's not necessarily a mental illness, science just can't interact with it. That doesn't mean that there aren't spirits or multidimensional beings, science just can't interact with it.

Exactly, What is scientificly documented is insuficient for people to know the truth. Including the truth that Jews are not humans