How much longer will the lie and cover-up of Maxine go on?

[AnonPoster]

Did you see what happened there? This person came in because he just wants to attack. Look, he can use the Anon if he wants. Now, stop trying to blame things on me. You’re also doing my head in, just a troll playing different sides.

Zola and the kid is doing this FOR A LONG TIME Now AND WITH MANY OTHERS. You missed that. Is nothing new since Mambe left...

There is NO POINT posting here making hits for these garbage people. Ignore is the best attitude. Not even 'exposing jos' doesn't worth the efforts for as you have zero guarantees that whatever you write here will stay up unaltered and for how long. If people respects themseves and their time that much, be my guest. Make t4s great at your expense

Why do you keep saying kid?

there is nothing to expose jos dog jos give free meditations rituals I got myself out of that crazy hood with jos meditations and rituals dog jos help many people

[shitposterInquisitor]

Same goes for you what I said to psychotron, shitposter.

You have said a lot of things to him/her/it. Can you be specific?

I don’t even know psychotron.

stares at you blankly What?!

Well, I’m not understanding what you’re saying.

OK...

[Amungus]

Same goes for you what I said to psychotron, shitposter.

You have said a lot of things to him/her/it. Can you be specific?

I don’t even know psychotron.

stares at you blankly What?!

Well, I’m not understanding what you’re saying.

OK...

When you speak to Owen, it's best if you speak calmly with positive enforcement so that he doesn't have a traumatic episode.

For example,

"Owen, I really don't feel that banning Agartha666 was appropriate. It seems that you did so emotionally and that you might later regret your decision. First of all Agartha was at least attempting to expose important things he felt were necessary to speak about, which by all means supports the narrative of the t4s, right? So why delete that shitposter and let the unproductive ones scurry around this place? Why, magnificent Highest of all Priests Owen the dominating Demi-god of Justice?

[Amungus]

OK...

When you speak to Owen, it's best if you speak calmly with positive enforcement so that he doesn't have a traumatic episode.

For example,

"Owen, I really don't feel that banning Agartha666 was appropriate. It seems that you did so emotionally and that you might later regret your decision. First of all Agartha was at least attempting to expose important things he felt were necessary to speak about, which by all means supports the narrative of the t4s, right? So why delete that shitposter and let the unproductive ones scurry around this place? Why, magnificent Highest of all Priests Owen the dominating Demi-god of Justice?

Reactivated his account. And I know it’s a place of free speech, but I was just not in a mood. It’s this mercury retrograde, normally I’m not like that.

Oh shit, I didn't think that would work. Maybe there's hope for you after all

[Psychotron]

Oh shit, I didn't think that would work.

You’re a wizard Reddawn!

[Fluxinella Stellaris]

I am Agartha666, who was banned by Owen on this thread. I wouldn't be surprised if this gets taken down and my only other account ever -- banned. Read the whole thing before coming to conclusions, or else your inquiry is insincere.

THE JOY OF SATAN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F9olKS ... sp=sharing

https://www.docdroid.net/HvPaVRA/the-jos-case-pdf

https://www.scribd.com/document/595556801/The-JoS-Case

https://www.dropbox.com/home?preview=The+JoS+Case.pdf

FYI you don't have to like National Socialism, but please let me have my free speech. At the end, there is a dropbox link for the edited works I did, as well as my own very comprehensive manifesto that is more in-depth about the Third Reich than the stuff Don flip-flopped on. Satanism is about individuality as much as collectivism, in my opinion. I'm not saying don't heed the sermons here if that's your calling. The important thing is that, rightfully, the circumspect info is available, so there's a fair opportunity to connect intrinsic dots -- to see the pattern in all this convolution of drama and conjecture.. JoS censors and I hope T4S is better than that.

https://gab.com/OfficerAnglo88

Cheers, Hail Satan!

I read it all. Clear and insightful, thank you for sharing.

Hail Satan!

[Mastermind]

On page 8 of that pdf Chad Burgess states that he got the MAC address of HPHC. That's not possible unless he was in the same LAN (in the same house!). He knows some technical terms but has ZERO knowledge about how networks work. That completely destroys his reputation and anything said after that is not to be trusted.
It's as laughable as saying that you put an airplane in reverse gear.

[Mastermind]

On page 8 of that pdf Chad Burgess states that he got the MAC address of HPHC. That's not possible unless he was in the same LAN (in the same house!). He knows some technical terms but has ZERO knowledge about how networks work. That completely destroys his reputation, and anything said after that is not to be trusted.
It's as laughable as saying that you put an airplane in reverse gear.

I came on to edit my post for updates, and to just have another look -- and I saw your comment, so I made more edits. I come on JoS/T4S sometimes just to check up briefly, but prefer not to engage; however, today....Well, you're presumptuous and ignorant....I'm not even into software like a geek (not hating on geeks), and I debunked you...lol.. I'm hard on you even if you made an innocent mistake because you're crossing me. Do your research next time; you have no ethos 'mastermind,' lol. I hope you learned a lesson, wise guy.

Drop the M!C

-OUT

https://yewtu.be/watch?v=rYodcvhh7b8
A router will strip layer 2 information (MAC addresses) from the packet before forwarding it. It will add its own source MAC address and destination MAC address (of the next router or computer). The next router will do the same.
In other words, if the packet crosses a router, the MAC address is lost. There are very many routers that comprise the internet so if "chad piece of shit" (which is now on page 10 of your edited garbage) wasn't in the same LAN as HPHC there is no way for "chad piece of shit" to know the MAC address.

Btw I'd appreciate it if you could fix your potty mouth before talking to me again.

[Mastermind]

...

Btw, you sound very much like FancyMancy. Just my 6th sense kicking in.

[AnonPoster]

On page 8 of that pdf Chad Burgess states that he got the MAC address of HPHC. That's not possible unless he was in the same LAN (in the same house!). He knows some technical terms but has ZERO knowledge about how networks work. That completely destroys his reputation and anything said after that is not to be trusted.
It's as laughable as saying that you put an airplane in reverse gear.

Hello (((Mastermind))). Have you taken a break from your deranged thoughts about how every post on JoS should cost shekels and that the site shouldn’t be free? Just what Jews want