Dedicated to Truth, Life, Liberty and the Advancement of the Soul
https://truth4satan.com/T4SForum/
So now it is not Hebrew anymore, it is Sanskrit to death. You changed again.Don Danko wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:05 am The situation with Satanama is if you look at the formula for this Sa is birth, Ta is life Na is death and Ma is rebirth. Which makes Satan by this Sanskrit mantra literally one of death. The ending of life.
If you take Nama Sata and arrange it to Satanama it still does not change Satan is the ending of life. Satan is the angel of death.
Snakeway wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:52 pm The ancient Sanskrit mantra and greeting Namaste in its original and most ancient form is spelled Namasta. The full spelling of this is with the letter S which is Sa in Sanskrit.
Making Namasata. Nama Sata, which is paying homage to the name of the indwelling God, Sata. In Sanskrit Sata is also spelled with the nasal ending. Making Sata......SATAN.
Hence the ancient greeting to indwelling spirit the indwelling god, Nama Satan.
Satanama holds the same meaning obviously as Nama Satan.
Then comes the jew and ''Satan is Hebrew to...''. This is what I believe, or something like this.
In my opinion this appeal to authority figure or to number of followers is the weakest defence of a point. Most people are christians or muslism so according to this line of thought what they say should hold more value because of this.HPBlackMamba wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:48 am Here is the link to back my statement that JoS is rejected by the most notable Satanic groups internationally. JoS is the laughing stock of the internet, just because you were a clergy there for 16 years doesn't mean anything.
https://hungariancultistnazis.wordpress ... te-period/
I wasn't appealing to an authority figure or number of followers. I was just linking to the the source for my statement that notable groups denounce JoS so that people can see that I am not making this stuff up. Of course, I have no problem with the JoS even though I disagree with some of their beliefs.Snakeway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:16 amIn my opinion this appeal to authority figure or to number of followers is the weakest defence of a point. Most people are christians or muslism so according to this line of thought what they say should hold more value because of this.HPBlackMamba wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:48 am Here is the link to back my statement that JoS is rejected by the most notable Satanic groups internationally. JoS is the laughing stock of the internet, just because you were a clergy there for 16 years doesn't mean anything.
https://hungariancultistnazis.wordpress ... te-period/
Don't blame the stupidity of people taking drugs and becoming addicts on some fucking entity. At the end of the day they were the ones who shoved it into their bodies not some random entity.Don Danko wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 7:46 am Zena Lavey called her father's organization a cult and simply a projection of her fathers own ego. Who she refers to as a con man with a puerile ideology of just being a sociopath. Zena stated her fathers cult left a lot of people psychologically damaged and mentally traumatized. And she founded an organization to help them heal from the abuse of the CoS.
Zach Black follows this ideology and has spent most of his life making videos about his life as a criminal dealing drugs, being on all kinds of drugs and booze as an addict and being in and out of rehab and prison for drugs. These are not people I would offer as some kind of a statement to Satanism as an appeal to authority. It just further proves my point of what these entities including the Satan entity do to people.
Some blog from a guy who brags he cucks himself with dating professional whores who work in an exploitive industry full of drugs and insanity a dude who is a furry which is a fetish sub culture based on animal rape and a blog from a mentality ill and obsessive individual which legitimately is full of slander. Is your argument.
Other people's opinion of the JoS do not invalidate close to 16 years of my personal experience of having been a Satanist and having worked with these entities including Satan. You just seem to be mad at me for not validating some ideology of yours and just want to minimize myself out of your pointless anger, maybe resentment as you and Zola got into contact with me and offered me a position in your clergy right away which I turned down. Which I didn't do out of rudeness I was just tired from years of working seven days a week as clergy. Maybe you should have asked the criminal drug addict, STD cuck weirdo or animal rape obsessed furry. Just another day in Satanism.
But I doHPBlackMamba wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:51 am Of course, I have no problem with the JoS even though I disagree with some of their beliefs.
I know this is off topic, but what is your problem? what do you have against them?Snakeway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 12:01 pmBut I doHPBlackMamba wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:51 am Of course, I have no problem with the JoS even though I disagree with some of their beliefs.
HPBlackMamba wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:13 am The truth is that JoS has been denounced by the majority of Satanists out there. Just because I am sharing my views with you, that doesn't mean I am mad or angry. I was merely presenting facts and explaining why I doubt your statements.I don't need you to validate the T4S beliefs nor are you obligated to believe it.
Snakeway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:12 am
So now it is not Hebrew anymore, it is Sanskrit to death. You changed again.
Wouldn't that be satana instead of Satan then to mean death? And what with the change of meaning? Some people say Sa means truth and tan means eternal, and others say Sa means birth and Ta life.
The way I see it knowledge has been lost and judging by the way jews behave this is about some appropriation and change of meaning with lots of slander. And more important than all, my personal experience with this being called Satan is positive.
They have not paid for some crimesHPBlackMamba wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 12:03 pmI know this is off topic, but what is your problem? what do you have against them?Snakeway wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 12:01 pmBut I doHPBlackMamba wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:51 am Of course, I have no problem with the JoS even though I disagree with some of their beliefs.